We get very poor expected returns for U.S. stocks even after making generous assumptions. While in the case of foreign stocks, we get returns much higher than for U.S. stocks even after significant haircuts to some key fundamental assumptions.DeconstructingEuropeanAndEMStockReturns
Listen to a replay of our first quarter 2019 Litman Gregory research call. Topics covered (among others): the equity rebound, conditions in Europe, floating-rate loans, managed futures, and emerging-market bonds. The presentation slides are available below.
View and download the presentation slides here:Litman_Gregory_Q1-2019_Research-Call_Presentation_Slides
Across the board, it was an extremely difficult year to make money in the financial markets, with almost every asset class and financial market down for the year. The contrast with 2017’s strong market results is also striking—and serves as a useful reminder of the unpredictability of markets.Year-End-2018_Investment_Commentary
Advisors are invited to hear the replay of Litman Gregory’s October 18 Research Call webinar. This quarter we discuss our equity market views, the value of alternative strategies, our response to Howard Marks’s recent memo, Oakmark and Cove Street funds.
View and download the presentation slides here:Litman-Gregory-Q3-2018-Research-Call-Presentation-Slides
Advisors are invited to hear the replay of Litman Gregory’s July 26 Research Call webinar. This quarter we discuss our equity market views, recent underperformance at Cove Street and Northern Cross, and our thesis on managed futures.
View and download the presentation slides here:Litman_Gregory_Research_Call_Presentation_Slides_Q2-2018
The latest news item causing concern for investors in European stocks has been the recent political turmoil in Italy. The country’s political leaders have failed to form lasting coalition governments and unite disparate factions in their electorate for some time now. Yields on Italian sovereign bonds are now spiking, adding to the perception that something is coming to a head.
For us, the weight of the evidence tells us nothing material has changed and to stay the course in terms of our modest overweight to European stocks in our portfolios:
- Political turmoil is nothing new for Italy. The country has had over 60 governments since World War II. One commentator on Italian politics in explaining this turnover says, “Italy’s history of encouraging coalition government, the multiple wings of political parties creating internal conflict, and the country’s relative youth are all factors.” However, it’s true that Italy is much larger and relevant than Greece, which was the center of crisis previously.
- Could Italy leave the euro and is contagion risk again a plausible scenario? Leaving the currency union would inflict a lot of short-term pain on a country—even the populists know that. Yet the possibility of the euro not holding together as some countries leave has been a risk factor we have weighed for many years. In fact, that risk was a part of our thinking behind initiating a Europe fat pitch during the Greek crisis in 2012, which we ultimately unwound nine months or so later with a small tactical gain. That risk continues to weigh on our minds, along with other risk factors: financials, tech sector weightings, etc. This is why our overweight to Europe is modest relative to the opportunity we see there.
- The profit gap between European and U.S. stocks is at historical highs. And we believe this is not yet priced in. From the outset, we’ve believed a tactical overweight to Europe would pay off as this gap declined.
- European companies generate about half of their revenues outside Europe, and they have relatively little trade/GDP exposure with Italy. All this shields to some extent the European companies we are invested with. Of course, we know negative sentiment can make cheap assets cheaper. So, it’s possible we may have to be more patient. This is a point we made in our most recent quarterly commentary too, due to factors other than Italy.
- Italy’s political turmoil may lead to other positives as it relates to our modest Europe overweight. For example, it could lead the ECB to maintain a looser monetary policy for longer; it could cause Europe to take steps to integrate in a way that makes sense rather than this muddling along, which has caused economic and social pain; etc.
—Rajat Jain, CFA (5/30/18)
Note: These materials are intended for the use of investment professionals only and may contain information that is not suitable for all investors. This presentation is provided by Litman Gregory Asset Management, LLC (“Litman Gregory”) for informational purposes only and no statement is to be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell a security, or the rendering of personalized investment advice. There is no agreement or understanding that Litman Gregory will provide individual advice to any investor or advisory client in receipt of this document. Certain information constitutes “forward-looking statements” and due to various risks and uncertainties actual events or results may differ from those projected. Some information contained in this report may be derived from sources that we believe to be reliable; however, we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of such information. Past performance may not be indicative of future results and there can be no assurance the views and opinions expressed herein will come to pass. Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Any reference to a market index is included for illustrative purposes only, as an index is not a security in which an investment can be made. Indexes are unmanaged vehicles that do not account for the deduction of fees and expenses generally associated with investable products. For additional information about Litman Gregory, please consult the Firm’s Form ADV disclosure documents, the most recent versions of which are available on the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website (adviserinfo.sec.gov) and may otherwise be made available upon written request.